Religion And Discrimination :: essays research papers

Religion and DiscriminationOne might take the view that society should be tolerant to any pietismso long as it conforms to our laws and written constitution. At first glance,this avowal seems as fit an answer as possible to the question of societallimits to sacred tolerance. Unofrtunately, if one were to consider thematter with more caution, one would lastly see that the statement could onlybe part of a great answer. It is without a consideration of some of theelements which constitute furores, as well as other factors, that one would falterin devising a authoritative answer to the question.Certain nexts or faiths which claim to be religions that atomic number 18 usual today are, in actuality, forms of cults. Although approximately of thepractices and elements common to cults are legal, they are, at best, suspect.The following should constitute the line of telerance society should not cross.Firstly, what distinguishes cults from religions is the behavior in whichthey oper ate. Cults are designed with a view of insulating the individual fromthe rest of society. Once a member of a cult, in most cases, the individual isremoved of most (if not all) of their personal autonomy. Most decisions aremade by the cult leader, access to the outside world is often denied, and allinformation close the outside world is distorted by the leader. These types ofoperations should be bitter by society.Second, there should be no tolerance for religions that espouse anyform of sacrifice, be it human or animal. Although historically, thesepractices were more or little prevalent and accepted, there certainly is no placefor them in advanced times.Lastly, there should be a limit of religious tolerance with regards tothe manner in which some display their beliefs. Individuals in society shouldnot be subject toa ny violence or restriction of freedom as a consequence ofsomeone elses beliefs. There fork out been numerous illustrations of this in thepast. Individuals have block ed abotion clinics, have participated in violentdemonstrations concerning one issue or another, ad infinitum. These types ofreligiously-fuelled practices have no place in, and should not be tolerated, inpresent day society.For some, the state has been seen to usurp the place of God on occasion.The fervent belief held by Jehovahs Witnesses, in assence, acts as the basis oftheir religious dissent. There have been certain areas of the law, whichhistorically, have given rise to the engagement between the Canadian legal systemand Jahovahs Witnesses. As a consequent of this conflict, a myriad of implicationshave arisen.