Norwegian Security Policy After The Cold War :: essays research papers

Norwegian Security Policy after the frozen struggle scorn widespread diplomatic discussion, and sentiment that the UN SecurityCouncil must be grow in order to maintain its long-term legitimacy, nogenerally unimpeachable formula for expansion has emerged. Concerns for obtainingor retaining voting power, and for preserving a body merged so as to be ableto take prompt and trenchant decisions, have prevented agreement. This articlereviews various criteria for evaluating restructuring proposals, and suggests aformula that, while non fundamentally affecting the distribution of power on theCouncil, might return many states minimal requirements for an acceptablepackage of changes.The end of the Cold War between East and West has strengthened Norwegian protective covering, which makes Norway no distinct from most other European countries.There are now more than dimensions to security policy than there were when theoverriding aim was deterrence by means of peerlesss own and allied forces forces.Cold War perceptions of military threat no longer exist. In Norways particularcase, however, it is possible to talking about a remaining strategic threat, whenreferring to Russian deployments in the far north. Such a threat is only apotential one and is not imminent today. Yet it has to be acknowledged that warsbetween nations and cultural groups have hardly been abolished. As a result, ithas become more demanding to identify the risk of armed aggression directedagainst Norway The risk would expect to reside in the escalation of a whole seriesof completely divers(prenominal) political developments. For example, these eventualitiescould take the form of the emergence of a nationalistic dictatorship, or thedevelopment of ungovernable political chaos in formerly communist countries.Because of the existence of some precise large arsenals and supplies of militaryequipment, it is important to adjudicate the political aims of potential opponents.These rear end change over time, not least(prenominal) if they represent irrational andaggressive attitudes. The nuclear weapons of the great powers do not seem tohave any deterrent effect on " barbaric ethnic cleansing", and the emergence ofarmed conflicts in different areas can be difficult to predict.But a countrys security can likewise be subject to something that has become moretopical after the Cold War low level threats. These are related to some verydifferent types of irregular national border transgressions, for exampleinternational abhorrence and various forms of pollution.The Cold Wars dominating concept, security by means of deterrence, iscomplemented by the concept of collective security. This harmonises well withthe traditional Norwegian approach to security policy of combining deterrencewith reassurance. The potential enemy is also a partner. A small country has no