Discrimination in social work Essay

As complaisant bring iners be involved with comparatively ineffective people within the community, they argon in an influential position with regards to the fair handling of many single out soulfulnesss. This unfair manipulation comes in the forms of discrimination and heaviness. Discrimination stooge be defined as the map of giving less favourable treatment, by injustice and stereotype, of individuals typically belonging to groups who are a relatively strengthless explode of society.Discrimination mountain come in several forms Direct Discrimination, which can be seen directed against sexuality when, for example, a womanish is denied a job interview as it is believed she will not fit into the masculine environment. substantiating Discrimination is present when the intentions of a rule or policy do not display apparent discrimination, that can result in poor treatment. Harassment is the eliminateance of unjust treatment towards a person due to a situation chara cteristic, such(prenominal) as ethnicity, which makes for an undesirable and sometimes hostile environment or brings active a violation of the victims dignity.Victimisation can occur when a person rightly makes a sickness in line with the equating Act, and this results in malevolence or disconfirming treatment towards the complainant. From person-to-person experience, I have witnessed this occur within interactions between members of front of polarity and kitchen staff in a restaurant, wherein an advisedly hostile and cold atmosphere was created for the individual who lodged the complaint.Oppression is the act of taking the prejudice inherent in Direct and Indirect Discrimination further through and through negative and unfair wielding of big businessman, inflicting hardship and disadvantage upon those patently inferior in the cordial structure. This power cosmosness a force for compulsive people which those apparently more paramount in the hierarchy are adequate of exerting. The forms Oppression takes include such systems as ageism, sexism, classism, and those in supreme positions use these systems to pose rights and freedoms of these individuals and this unjust domination adversely fixs a persons life chances. everywheredue to variables inherent in peoples identity, such as age, ethnicity and gender, an individual oppressed on the causa of skin colour may as well as be considered to have an advantage oer someone considered old in socially constructed value as far as age is concerned, and thus could fall into the social function of oppressor. In a bid to argufy and reduce structural disadvantage, discrimination and burdensomeness within misgiving work, framework for Anti-Discriminatory radiation pattern (A. D. P. ) has been introduced.A main focus of A. D. P. is displace the thickening in their social consideration, which is the acknowledgement of not only characteristics specific to different groups, scarcely withal chara cteristics peculiar to a busy individual, and the tailoring of deal out in relation to these differences to avoid undermining diversity, as is considered good practice in social work. It recognizes that uniform care does not work effectively for everybody, such as anticipate homogeny when treating those of ethnic minorities in an identical vogue to when treating a client from the dominant culture.This could also be viewed as a system of assimilation into the norms of that society, and can be an oppression of identity. Previously, MANAGEMENT? had deemed A. D. P. un strategic (Thompson/Dvies? )and such outlooks make care liable to adopt such exclusive atiitudes as the colour-blind and gender-blind approaches. These are edges that refer to the ignorance of ethnic and gender influences on an individuals personality, resulting in inappropriate and purge autocratic treatment caused possibly by care with male or dominant culture bias.Though these two particular groups are highligh ted, discrimination in care work methods can also affect other disadvantaged demographics such as the disabled, elderly and those of different religious beliefs. Thompson argues that maintaining an sentiency of A. D. P. is essential in combating discrimination and oppression, and that refusing to put in becomes part of the problem. Furthermore, Giddens (1977) supports the view that weakness nuetral use of sea captain power allows inequalities to persist, and that it mustiness be used proactively to transform oppressive structures.Giddens also notes that negative use of this power can reinforce inequalities. Another heavy part A. D. P. is Giddens Emancipatory Politics(1991) which aims at liberating clients from their disadvantaged positions. Identified within this are terce imperatives to keep mindful of, the first being Justice, which is suggestive of fair treatment and the agency that people will not be exploited or have rights denied. Equality is the next, which opposes un iform treatment, identifying it as a barricade to fairness.Thirdly, troth is a key supposition in objectives to emancipate and empower clients to improve cope with, or be change state from their circumstances, all the while using the clients legitimate power to answer the power abuse brought round by discrimination and oppression. This involves cooperation of social workers and service users in planning and evaluating services to improve potency opportunities and to help the service provide adequate care (Beresford and Croft 1993, in Davies?).In A. D. P, this family relationship is recognised as a fusion, a more sensitive term which is not suggestive of power interactions, but more on mutual transcription (Thompson, 1996, DAVIES? ) promoting a sensibility and understanding about the inequalities to be addressed. Using the word partnership can also foster an part of trust between the two parties, as social workers are so often demonised in the media, and this enhances mistrust towards them.These relationships can splinter into conflicts between parties, though long-term victor relies on not abandoning the partnership and maintaining sea captain willingness. (DAVIES? ) An important focus in Participation is to enable the client to use their make power to liberate themselves from oppression, and to avoid the friendly paternalism of the past which created an environment of dependency through protecting the less fortunate from their problems (Bailey and Brake, 1975 DAVIES).A complication to fair practice in social work is that some situations can be complex and open to legion(predicate) interpretations, and this is where the judgement of a professional, takes precedence over technical reasoning and codes of practice (jordan, 1990 pp. 3-4, DAVIES? ). In making professional judgements, moral reasoning and due analysis must be taken to avoid messy situations(Schon, 1983). similarly essential for professionals to ingest a sensitivity towards fee lings when making such decisions. Insensitive discussion is a contradiction of A. D. P. and have more negative effects than positive (DAVIES? )Professionals being a person with attributes such as having engaged in lengthy preparation with assessment of competence, authority acknowledged by service users and a thorough speculation of field based on reasearch certify (Banks, 2001, Gomm, 1996 BRIANS HANDOUT). Though care must be taken in relation to these decisions to cover there is no abuse of professionals power resulting in coercion upon service users(Davies), and instead that it supports equality and emancipation. (DAVIES? ). It is important to not allow subjectiveness and personal prejudices to obstruct care. Also essential for professionals to possess a sensitivity towards feelings