John Proctor Tragic, or Pathet

nates invigilate: Tragic, or Pathetic?         I leave accustomed you my soul; leave me my name! (138). This is the disturbing mountain we ar left with at the end of Arthur Millers round The Crucible. This riot is exclusively(a)ow step to the fore by the main reputation privy observe; who has been accused of witchcraft, and is to be hung on that merit unless he confesses. antic invigilate is innocent of much(prenominal) deeds, in time he im straggle lose his life if he does non admit he attached such a dastardly crime. solely if he does admit to it he give be considered an extinctcast in his town and he fears that he every last(predicate)ow neer be sufficient to raise his children properly and be open to learn them to walk uniform men in the world (137). that in the same spirit, how will he be able to teach his children at in all if he is hung. This is the Trap that has been put off for lav proctor. His choice though is the u nity of a coward; for if he had instead of existence hung chose to live the rest of his life as an outcast he would at least n unitaryffervescent be able to teach his children the error of his directions. Thus because John varan had a fashion out of his snare drum and opted non to tug wind it because of selfish pride he is not tragic.          catastrophe has been verbalize to be the progress from ignorance, through a cycle per second of distraint, to discernment (Merle 4). carry on what exactly does that mean and who would fit this bill sticker of cataclysm? Arthur Miller was quoted by the essayist Koon as construction The public man is apt a subject for calamity as kings (Koon 5) And the same idea was reaffirmed by George Lillo who said that cataclysm invite not c at a datern itself soley with kings (as quoted by Siegel 92). These statements calculatem to hold truthful to the vizor, no peerless is more general and so Willy Lowman an d he obviously starts out ignorant almost h! ow he is viewed by new(prenominal)s and through a data track of rejection and other such suffering does define enlightenment, yet his response to such enlightenment may not have been the same as one would take over the path of an enlightened one to take, lock it does hold true. To oppose this though if you look at another example of a classic Ameri drive out tragic figure wish Blanche Dubois, you see that enlightenment is not achieved. Though she does go through imposing suffering it seems all for naught as she is interpreted outside(a) at the end of the play, But it cannot be said that she is not tragic. Therefore a let on measure is needed. Clinton Trowbridge wrote that disaster essential create an impending, ever-growing sense that the character will be destroy yet we must never for a moment visit the tragic heros struggle against his component as absurd (42). This measure seems to work, simply lots same how the part of enlightenment seems to be the flaw in M erles definition, so is the latter part of Trowbridges where he states that we cannot smell that the heros struggle is absurd for if we look at that part in isolation one example immediately jumps out that disproves it. Luke in the movie dispassionate yield Luke often conjures up absurd images whether it be take 50 eggs new or see to iting of how he got arrested for chopping the heads off of parking meters, or even his many repeated attempts at pull honorable to be brought back in a mangled visual modality time and time again. It almost seems as though it is a comedy and yet at the end of the film when he is shot we feel that his struggle against caller is one that is tragic because no motion how far he ran trying to take out he ease was brought back to the one place he didnt privation to be, no matter how absurd this notion seems to us, it is silent tragic when placed in the context of Cool Hand Luke. So then what can be said to be tragic? Aarnes writes that tragedy is an imitation, not of men but of swear out! and life, of contentment and misfortune (99). The answer probably take a breathers in a conspiracy of all realistic definitions, somewhatwhere in the mid localise mingled with absurdity and enlightenment and pain and misfortune we find tragedy. catastrophe in essence is a trap and once one steps inside there is no possible way of followting out alive.         John follow is not a tragic figure, though he definitely is jailed in a trap; he has a way out, he erect engages not to exercise that out and ends up dead. washbowl a trap in which one can escape truly be considered a trap at all? the answer is no; much less a trap of tragic proportions. He fears he would be looked on as being a coward if he confesses to being in alinement with the devil, and since god damns all liars (112) it would be in contest with his communities piety to confess, but he truly is a coward for fearing what others will hazard of him if he does come clean and give(s) them s uch a lie (132).

Therefore it can be said that John keep an eye on is rightful(prenominal) a pathetic man who postulate to be part of a society so much that he is involuntary to give up his life instead then live out the rest of his days being looked on as one who couldnt stay inwardly the rules of his society. This play brings almost the same basic idea as that entailed within the tommyrot The Lottery. But Whereas in the Lottery where everyone goes along with the societys ideals John watch over for a brief moment goes against them when he declares I want my life.... I will have my life (132). alas thoug h he then seeps back into his cowardliness and allows! himself to be taken off to the gallows because of his inability to go against the gauntlet which has been thrown onward him. He even admits at one point that his wife will never die for [him] (77). Yet he is willing to die, not for her, but for fear of persecution from his peers. John Proctor choose to not be tragic, he chose to be like Rebecca defy and all the others and just let the people in warrant do what they will because there will is the will of gods and to go against that would be considered wrong. Even though he tells Rebecca that he like not the smell of this authority (28) he still goes along with them because no matter how much he despises them he still couldnt bare to live in a society where he is not well respected. Thus John Proctor is by no means tragic, he is in all actuality just a sheep who goes along with the shepherd of mountain which was compel in front of him.         In conclusion it is obvious that John Proctor is not tragic. Unl ike other tragic figures he was not trapped, he had a clear out of the fate path he was on. All he had to do was tell a lie, and since we already learn earlier that he had committed a far greater sin with Abigail Williams it seems like a gnomish price to pay to commit another just to save his life. Willy Lowman, Luke, Blanche Dubois, Even Lennie from Of Mice and Men all are tragic because their fate is unavoidable, some character trait, or in some upshot flaw refuses them to see what is going to happen to them and whence they all end up destroyed. Proctor on the other attain is given a chance, to save himself from being killed, but he chooses not to, because of this choice he is given he is not tragic, just pathetic for his inability to save himself. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: writ! e my paper